Abstract 19599: Continuous versus 3 Weeks Intermittent ECG Monitoring for Detection of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation in High-Risk Patients
BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) often occurs in a subclinical form, which makes it difficult to detect. The effect of continuous versus intermittent rhythm monitoring to detect subclinical AF is poorly investigated in patients with age ≥ 65 years, hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Th...
Saved in:
Published in | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 134; no. Suppl_1 Suppl 1; p. A19599 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
by the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association, Inc
11.11.2016
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) often occurs in a subclinical form, which makes it difficult to detect. The effect of continuous versus intermittent rhythm monitoring to detect subclinical AF is poorly investigated in patients with age ≥ 65 years, hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM). This group of patients has increased risk of developing AF and in addition a high thromboembolic risk, if AF is present.PurposeTo investigate whether continuous monitoring using an implantable loop recorder (ILR) detects more episodes of subclinical AF than daily intermittent monitoring for 3 weeks in high-risk patients.MethodsA total of 82 outpatients ≥ 65 years (median age 71.3 years (IQR 67.4-75.1)) with DM and HTN, and no history of AF or any other cardiovascular disease, were consecutively included. All patients received an ILR and were followed for a median of 342 days (IQR 208-456). To compare continuous monitoring with intermittent monitoring, we used the device to simulate a 2 minutes daily handheld ECG data collection for 3 weeks starting one month after ILR insertion. The primary end-point was AF with a minimum duration of two minutes. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment was initiated upon an AF episode lasting ≥ 6 minutes.ResultsDuring follow-up 17 patients (20.7 %) were found to have subclinical AF detected by the ILR with a median time to first detected episode of 126 days (IQR 56-260) from inclusion. Thirteen patients (15.9 %) had AF ≥ 6 minutes and initiated OAC treatment. On the contrary, only 2 patients (2.4 %) also presented with AF episodes on the simulated 3 weeks intermittent monitoring (p=0.04). All detected episodes were completely asymptomatic.ConclusionsContinuous monitoring with ILR detected significantly more AF episodes than 3 weeks daily intermittent monitoring. The incidence of subclinical AF in this group of patients was surprisingly high. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |