Transanal Irrigation in Children

Objectives: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and patient experience of transanal irrigation (TAI) in children with constipation or fecal incontinence. Methods: Combined retrospective and cross‐sectional study including pediatric patients who used a Navina TAI system. We retrospectively coll...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition Vol. 75; no. 2; pp. 166 - 172
Main Authors Baaleman, Desiree F., Wegh, Carrie A. M., Hoogveld, Maxime T. A., Benninga, Marc A., Koppen, Ilan J. N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and patient experience of transanal irrigation (TAI) in children with constipation or fecal incontinence. Methods: Combined retrospective and cross‐sectional study including pediatric patients who used a Navina TAI system. We retrospectively collected baseline characteristics and data on treatment success at 1‐ and 6‐month follow‐up (FU). Treatment success was defined as defecating at least 3 times per week and having less than 1 episode of fecal incontinence per week. We cross‐sectionally assessed health‐related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment adherence, treatment satisfaction (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM]), illness perceptions, medication beliefs, and patient empowerment with validated questionnaires. Results: Thirty‐four patients were included (median age at start TAI: 11 years old [range, 6–18]), 32 in the retrospective review, and 26 in the cross‐sectional survey (median of 3 years after initiation). Most patients were diagnosed with functional constipation (n = 26; 76%) or a neurogenic bowel disorder (n = 6; 18%). Treatment success rates significantly improved at each FU compared with baseline (baseline: 4/25 [16%]; 1‐month FU: 12/16 [75%], P = 0.008; 6‐month FU: 11/18 [61%], P = 0.016; cross‐sectional FU: 13/26 [50%], P = 0.008). HRQoL scores were high (PedsQL median, 73 [IQR, 54–85]). Adherence (defined as Medication Adherence Report Scale [MARS] ≥ 23) was low (36%), whereas TSQM effectiveness scores were high (median, 69 [IQR, 47–86]). The majority of children (61%) reported an increase in independence since TAI treatment. Patient empowerment (GYPES) levels were similar to those reported in children with other chronic conditions. Conclusions: TAI with a Navina system is an effective bowel management system for children with intractable constipation or fecal incontinence.
Bibliography:Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML text of this article on the journal's Web site
Trial register number and URL: Trial NL9691, NTR (trialregister.nl).
Drs Baaleman and Wegh contributed equally as cofirst authors to the article.
Sources of Funding: This investigator‐initiated study was supported by a nonrestricted grant provided by Wellspect. Wellspect is the manufacturer of Navina, the device being studied Wellspect had no role in study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, nor the decision to submit the article.
www.jpgn.org
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
.
ISSN:0277-2116
1536-4801
DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000003515