Validation of Blood Transfusion Risk Scores (TRACK and TRUST) in a Cardiac Surgery Service in Brazil

• Published in: Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 227 - 234
• Main Authors: Cunha, Cristiano Berardo Carneiro da, Monteiro, Verônica Soares, Ferraz, Diogo Luiz de Magalhães, Tchaick, Rodrigo Mezzalira, Carvalho Júnior, Jeú Delmondes de, Silva, Igor Tiago Correia, Figueira, Fernando Augusto Marinho dos Santos, Andrade, Lívia Barbosa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Portuguese
• Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2023
• Subjects: CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS; SURGERY; Confidence Intervals; Blood Transfusion; Area Under Curve; Risk Factors; Erythrocytes; Thoracic Surgery; Comprehension
• ISSN: 1678-9741
• DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0156

ABSTRACT Introduction: Transfusion of red blood cells is recurrent in cardiac surgery despite the well-established deleterious effects. Identifying patients with higher chances of requiring blood transfusion is essential to apply strategic preventive measures to reduce such chances, considering the restricted availability of this product. The most used risk scores to predict blood transfusion are the Transfusion Risk and Clinical Knowledge (TRACK) and Transfusion Risk Understanding Scoring Tool (TRUST). However, these scores were not validated for the Brazilian population. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of TRACK and TRUST scores in estimating the need for postoperative transfusion of red blood cell concentrates (TRBCC) after cardiac surgery. Methods: A clinical retrospective study was conducted using the database of a Brazilian reference service composed of patients operated between November 2019 and September 2021. Scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test assessed calibration of the scores. Accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). All analyses considered a level of significance of 5%. The study was approved by the research ethics committee (CAAE 55577421.4.0000.5201). Results: This study assessed 498 patients. Only the TRACK score presented good calibration (P=0.238; TRUST P=0.034). AUC of TRACK was 0.678 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.73; P<0.001), showing a significant accuracy. Conclusion: Between the scores analyzed, only the TRACK score showed a good calibration, but low accuracy, to predict postoperative TRBCC after cardiac surgery.