First-principles microkinetic study of methane and hydrogen sulfide catalytic conversion to methanethiol/dimethyl sulfide on MoS clusters: activity/selectivity of different promoters

A large fraction of the global natural gas reserves is in the form of sour gas, i.e. contains hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and needs to be sweetened before utilization. The traditional amine-based separation process is energy-intensive, thereby lowering the value of the sour...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCatalysis science & technology Vol. 9; no. 17; pp. 4573 - 458
Main Authors Arvidsson, Adam A, Taifan, William, Hellman, Anders, Baltrusaitis, Jonas
Format Journal Article
Published 27.08.2019
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A large fraction of the global natural gas reserves is in the form of sour gas, i.e. contains hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and needs to be sweetened before utilization. The traditional amine-based separation process is energy-intensive, thereby lowering the value of the sour gas. Thus, there is a need to find alternative processes to remove, e.g. , hydrogen sulfide. Mo 6 S 8 clusters are promising candidates for transforming methane (CH 4 ) and hydrogen sulfide into methanethiol (CH 3 SH) and dimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 ), which are high-value sulfur-containing products that can be further used in the chemical industry. Here first-principles microkinetics is used to investigate the activity and selectivity of bare and promoted (K, Ni, Cl) Mo 6 S 8 . The results show that methanethiol is produced via two different pathways (direct and stepwise), while dimethyl sulfide is formed via a competing pathway in the stepwise formation of methanethiol. Moreover, there is an increase in activity and a decrease in selectivity when adding an electropositive promoter (K), whereas the reverse behaviour is observed when adding an electronegative promoter (Cl). When adding Ni there is also a decrease in activity and an increase in selectivity; however, Ni is acting as an electron donor. The results provide insights and guidance as to what catalyst formulation is preferred for the removal of hydrogen sulfide in sour gas. A large fraction of the global natural gas reserves is in the form of sour gas, i.e. contains hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and needs to be sweetened before utilization.
Bibliography:Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: A zip file with all structures and figures of the reaction mechanism for the K-, Ni-, and Cl-promoted clusters, a free energy landscape, a comparison of the TOF for all clusters, tables with kinetic information, the steady-state coverages, the effect of the diffusion barrier on the TOF and selectivity, a degree of rate control analysis for all clusters, and the projected crystal orbital Hamiltonian populations. See DOI
10.1039/c9cy00375d
ISSN:2044-4753
2044-4761
DOI:10.1039/c9cy00375d