Robust clinical detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants by RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF multi-target approach
The COVID-19 pandemic sparked rapid development of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. However, emerging variants pose the risk for target dropout and false-negative results secondary to primer/probe binding site (PBS) mismatches. The Agena MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel combines RT-PCR and MALDI-TOF mass-spectrom...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of medical virology Vol. 94; no. 4; pp. 1606 - 1616 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
16.12.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The COVID-19 pandemic sparked rapid development of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. However, emerging variants pose the risk for target dropout and false-negative results secondary to primer/probe binding site (PBS) mismatches. The Agena MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel combines RT-PCR and MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometry to probe for five targets across
N
and
ORF1ab
genes, which provides a robust platform to accommodate PBS mismatches in divergent viruses. Herein, we utilize a deidentified dataset of 1,262 SARS-CoV-2-positive specimens from Mount Sinai Health System (New York City) from December 2020 through April 2021 to evaluate target results and corresponding sequencing data. Overall, the level of PBS mismatches was greater in specimens with target dropout. Of specimens with N3 target dropout, 57% harbored an A28095T substitution that is highly-specific for the alpha (B.1.1.7) variant of concern. These data highlight the benefit of redundancy in target design and the potential for target performance to illuminate the dynamics of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | M.M.H. and A.E.PM are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. M.M.H., R.B., P.S., H.A., S.F., A.A., A.E.PM., M.R.G., M.D.N., and E.M.S. provided clinical samples for the study. M.M.H., R.B., P.S., L.C., F.C., H.S., and A.E.PM. accessioned clinical samples. A.S.GR., A.v.d.G., Z.K., B.A., and H.v.B. performed NGS experiments. R.S. provided NGS services. A.S.GR., and A.O. performed genome assembly, data curation and genotyping. M.M.H, L.H.P, and J.D.R. performed alignments and mismatch analyses. M.M.H., R.B., L.H.P, J.D.R., M.R.G., M.D.N., C.C.C., T.E.S., V.S., H.v.B., E.M.S., and A.E.PM analyzed, interpreted, or discussed data. M.M.H., E.M.S., and A.E.PM. wrote the manuscript. M.M.H., E.M.S., and A.E.PM. conceived the study. E.M.S. and A.E.PM. supervised the study. H.v.B., V.S., and E.M.S. raised financial support. Author contributions |
ISSN: | 0146-6615 1096-9071 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmv.27510 |