Scan-time Corrections for 80-100 Minute Standardized Uptake Volume Ratios to Measure the 18F-AV-1451 Tracer for Tau Imaging
The 18 F-AV-1451 PET tracer binds to tau, an Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) biomarker. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) 80–100 min window is widely used to quantify tau binding, although 18 F-AV-1451 continues increasing relative to a reference region in regions with tau deposition. Left uncorre...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on medical imaging Vol. 38; no. 3; pp. 697 - 709 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
17.09.2018
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The
18
F-AV-1451 PET tracer binds to tau, an Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) biomarker. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) 80–100 min window is widely used to quantify tau binding, although
18
F-AV-1451 continues increasing relative to a reference region in regions with tau deposition. Left uncorrected, acquisition time inaccuracies can lead to errors from −4% to 6% in 20-min SUVR measurements in subjects with Alzheimer’s Disease. In 40 subjects with scans from 75–115 min following
18
F-AV-1451 injection, we created 20-min reconstructions (4×5 min) of start-times ranging from 7585 min, as proxies of offset scans and calculated the mean in regions of interest (ROIs). We developed a Segmented Least Squares (SLS) method to obtain error-minimizing weighting coefficients for
18
F-AV-1451 ROIs that best predict SUVR 80–100 from weighted means of SUVRs from offset start-times. We compared residual errors of our SLS method to those in (1) uncorrected offset 20-min-SUVRs, (2) the mean of 5-min frames within the 80–100 window, and (3) a least-squares interpolation method. We evaluated errors induced by start-time offset on SUVRs for each method. SLS, which corrected using least-squares coefficients of 5-min components, consistently reduced errors across all offset start-times. Effect size analysis for simulated clinical longitudinal
18
F-AV-1451 drug trials showed that uncorrected 20-min offset SUVRs would require up to 20% more participants to detect treatment effects compared to using SLS. Correction of SUVR scantime errors by SLS minimizes errors compared to other correction methods and may be extended to other scanners and tracers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-0062 1558-254X |
DOI: | 10.1109/TMI.2018.2870441 |