Two-loads Method for Distinguishing among the Muscle Force, Velocity, and Power Producing Capacities
It has been generally accepted that muscles could have different mechanical capacities, such as those for producing high force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs. Nevertheless, the standard procedures of the evaluation of muscle function both in research and routine testing are typically condu...
Saved in:
Published in | Sports medicine (Auckland) Vol. 46; no. 11; pp. 1585 - 1589 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.11.2016
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | It has been generally accepted that muscles could have different mechanical capacities, such as those for producing high force (F), velocity (V), and power (P) outputs. Nevertheless, the standard procedures of the evaluation of muscle function both in research and routine testing are typically conducted under a single mechanical condition, such as under a single external load. Therefore, the observed outcomes do not allow for distinguishing among the different muscle capacities. As a result, the outcomes of most of the routine testing procedures have been of limited informational value, while a number of debated issues in research have originated from arbitrarily interpreted experimental findings regarding specific muscle capacities. A solution for the discussed problem could be based on the approximately linear and exceptionally strong F-V relationship typically observed from various functional tasks performed under different external loads. These findings allow for the 'two-loads method' proposed in this Current Opinion: the functional movement tasks (e.g., maximum jumping, cycling, running, pushing, lifting, or throwing) should be tested against just 2 distinctive external loads. Namely, the F-V relationship determined by 2 pairs of the F and V data could provide the parameters depicting the maximum F (i.e., the F-intercept), V (V-intercept), and P (calculated from the product of F and V) output of the tested muscles. Therefore, the proposed two-loads method applied in both research and routine testing could provide a deeper insight into the mechanical properties and function of the tested muscles and resolve a number of debated issues in the literature. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0112-1642 1179-2035 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40279-016-0531-z |