Labour Induction With Randomized Comparison Of Oral And Intravaginal Misoprostol In Post Date Multigravida Women

• Published in: The Malaysian journal of medical sciences Vol. 16; no. 1; pp. 34 - 38
• Main Authors: Ayaz, Aqueela, Saeed, Shazia, Farooq, Mian Usman, Ahmad, Iftikhar, Ali Bahoo, Muhammad Luqman, Saeed, Muhammad
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 01.01.2009
• Subjects: Original
• ISSN: 1394-195X; 2180-4303

The efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for elective induction of labor in post date multigravida with an unfavourable cervix was compared over a period of one year in the Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Eightyeight multigravida post date women were divided into two groups and given 50 mg misoprostol orally and 50 mg intravaginally, respectively. The induction to onset of significant uterine contractions and delivery intervals were lower in the first group (7.8 h vs. 8.9 h) when compared to (10.4 h vs. 12 h). The first group had a higher rate of Caesarean section (7% vs. 4%; p>0.05), uterine hyperstimulation (9% vs. 5%; p>0.05), uterine tachysystole (23% vs. 14%; p>0.05) and neonatal admissions to intensive care unit (12% vs. 4%; p>0.05) when compared to second group. Fifty mg oral misoprostol has the potential to induce labor as safely and effectively as the intravaginal route.