Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective EIN diagnosis

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a precursor to endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma characterized by monoclonal growth of mutated cells, a distinctive histopathologic appearance, and 45-fold elevated cancer risk. We have applied EIN diagnostic criteria to 97 successive endometrial...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inModern pathology Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 324 - 330
Main Authors Hecht, Jonathan L., Ince, Tan A., Baak, Jan P.A., Baker, Heather E., Ogden, Maryann W., Mutter, George L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.03.2005
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a precursor to endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma characterized by monoclonal growth of mutated cells, a distinctive histopathologic appearance, and 45-fold elevated cancer risk. We have applied EIN diagnostic criteria to 97 successive endometrial biopsies classified as hyperplastic according to WHO criteria and correlated results with computer assisted morphometry (D-score) and clinical cancer outcomes. Three pathologists separately reviewed all cases using EIN criteria (gland area>stromal area, cytologic change in focus of altered architecture, lesion size >1mm, and exclusion of cancer and mimics) to classify cases as EIN or non-EIN. Discordant cases were resolved by a consensus review at a multiheaded scope. Clinical outcomes were obtained in 84 patients from patient visit and pathology records. Diagnoses using EIN criteria were unanimous amongst all 3 pathologists in 75% of cases, and intraobserver-reproducibility was excellent (kappa 0.73-0.90). EIN cases encompassed hyperplasias previously diagnosed as atypical (n=18) or non-atypical (8 complex, 2 simple). Eight follow-up cancers were scattered between hyperplasia types (5/21 atypical, 3/63 non-atypical), but all classified as EIN (8/25) and D-Score ≤1 (8/38). Subjective application of EIN criteria correlates well with objective morphometry and successfully segregates patients into high and low cancer risk subgroups with high reproducibility.
Bibliography:To Whom Correspondence and Reprint Requests should be directed: George L. Mutter, MD, Div. of Women’s and Perinatal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, (617) 732-6096 Phone, (617) 738-6996 FAX, e-mail: gmutter@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
ISSN:0893-3952
1530-0285
DOI:10.1038/modpathol.3800328