Three-part scoring system (tripartite) for teledermatology versus International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria to interpret patch test readings: A comparative, observational study

• Published in: Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology p. 1
• Main Authors: Jasly, Kuttiali, Goyal, Sakshi, Ashwini, P K, Kanthraj, Garehatty Rudrappa, Chethana, S Gurumurthy, Ranugha, Subramaniam
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 06.04.2024
• Subjects: International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG); Three-Part Scoring System (TPSS); Face-to-face (in-person examination); Patch test; Teledermatology
• ISSN: 0973-3922

Background The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) grading is the gold standard and is used to interpret patch test results in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The ICDRG readings include a combination of visual and palpation findings. Digital photography limits palpation. An alternative scoring system exists to analyse 2D images and interpret patch test readings in teledermatology (TD). Aims To compare tri-partite scoring system (TPSS) (TD) with ICDRG (face-to-face) and to assess the feasibility of TPSS by TD. Methods In this observational study, two investigators each scored the patch test readings for 78 patients at the 48th h, 96th h and on the 7th day. Results The TPSS has a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93.34%, positive predictive value of 91.67% and negative predictive value of 100%. At a confidence interval of 95%, Cohen's kappa (0.90) indicated excellent agreement between both investigators. The concordance between both scoring systems was at 93.2% for agreement and 6.82% for disagreement. Polysensitisation (6 patients with 16 allergens) was detected equally in both methods. Limitations A single centre study. Conclusion The readings obtained by TPSS were in agreement with ICDRG. TPSS can reduce the number of patient visits by 50% and may be used during COVID-19 times and beyond.