Anesthetic oxygen use and sex are critical factors in the FLASH sparing effect

• Published in: bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
• Main Authors: Tavakkoli, Armin D, Clark, Megan A, Kheirollah, Alireza, Sloop, Austin M, Soderholm, Haille E, Daniel, Noah J, Petusseau, Arthur F, Huang, Yina H, Thomas, Charles R, Jarvis, Lesley A, Zhang, Rongxiao, Pogue, Brian W, Gladstone, David J, Hoopes, P Jack
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 05.11.2023

Ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) radiation has been reported to spare normal tissue compared to conventional dose-rate (CDR) radiation. However, reproducibility of the FLASH effect remains challenging due to varying dose ranges, radiation beam structure, and in-vivo endpoints. A better understanding of these inconsistencies may shed light on the mechanism of FLASH sparing. Here, we evaluate whether sex and/or use of 100% oxygen as carrier gas during irradiation contribute to the variability of the FLASH effect. C57BL/6 mice (24 male, 24 female) were anesthetized using isoflurane mixed with either room air or 100% oxygen. Subsequently, the mice received 27 Gy of either 9 MeV electron UHDR or CDR to a 1.6 cm diameter area of the right leg skin using the Mobetron linear accelerator. The primary post-radiation endpoint was time to full thickness skin ulceration. In a separate cohort of mice (4 male, 4 female) skin oxygenation was measured using PdG4 Oxyphor under identical anesthesia conditions. In the UHDR group, time to ulceration was significantly shorter in mice that received 100% oxygen compared to room air, and amongst them female mice ulcerated sooner compared to males. However, no significant difference was observed between male and female UHDR mice that received room air. Oxygen measurements showed significantly higher tissue oxygenation using 100% oxygen as the anesthesia carrier gas compared to room air, and female mice showed higher levels of tissue oxygenation compared to males under 100% oxygen. The FLASH sparing effect is significantly reduced using oxygen during anesthesia compared to room air. The FLASH sparing was significantly lower in female mice compared to males. Both tissue oxygenation and sex are likely sources of variability in UHDR studies. These results suggest an oxygen-based mechanism for FLASH, as well as a key role for sex in the FLASH skin sparing effect.