Antibiofilm Activity of 3D-Printed Nanocomposite Resin: Impact of ZrO 2 Nanoparticles

• Published in: Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 13; no. 3
• Main Authors: Khattar, Abdulrahman, Alghafli, Jawad A, Muheef, Mohammed A, Alsalem, Ali M, Al-Dubays, Mohammed A, AlHussain, Hussain M, AlShoalah, Hussain M, Khan, Soban Q, AlEraky, Doaa M, Gad, Mohammed M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Candida albicans; ZrO2 nanoparticles; cell proliferation assay; denture base; 3D printing
• ISSN: 2079-4991; 2079-4991

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is a commonly used material, as it is biocompatible and relatively cheap. However, its mechanical properties and weak antibiofilm activity are major concerns. With the development of new technology, 3D-printed resins are emerging as replacements for PMMA. Few studies have investigated the antibiofilm activity of 3D-printed resins. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the antibiofilm activity and surface roughness of a 3D-printed denture base resin modified with different concentrations of zirconium dioxide nanoparticles (ZrO NPs). A total of 60 resin disc specimens (15 × 2 mm) were fabricated and divided into six groups (n = 10). The groups comprised a heat-polymerized resin (PMMA) group, an unmodified 3D-printed resin (NextDent) group, and four 3D-printed resin groups that were modified with ZrO NPs at various concentrations (0.5 wt%, 1 wt%, 3 wt%, and 5 wt%). All specimens were polished using a conventional method and then placed in a thermocycler machine for 5000 cycles. Surface roughness (Ra, µm) was measured using a non-contact profilometer. The adhesion of ( ) was measured using a fungal adhesion assay that consisted of a colony forming unit assay and a cell proliferation assay. The data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A Mann-Whitney test was used for pairwise comparison, and -values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The lowest Ra value (0.88 ± 0.087 µm) was recorded for the PMMA group. In comparison to the PMMA group, the 3% ZrO NPs 3D-printed group showed a significant increase in Ra ( < 0.025). For the 3D-printed resins, significant differences were found between the groups with 0% vs. 3% ZrO NPs and 3% vs. 5% ZrO NPs ( < 0.025). The highest Ra value (0.96 ± 0.06 µm) was recorded for the 3% ZrO NPs group, and the lowest Ra values (0.91 ± 0.03 µm) were recorded for the 0.5% and 5% ZrO NPs groups. In terms of antifungal activity, the cell proliferation assay showed a significant decrease in the count for the 0.5% ZrO NPs group when compared with PMMA and all other groups of 3D-printed resins. The group with the lowest concentration of ZrO NPs (0.5%) showed the lowest level of adhesion of all the tested groups and showed the lowest count (0.29 ± 0.03). The addition of ZrO NPs in low concentrations did not affect the surface roughness of the 3D-printed resins. These 3D-printed resins with low concentrations of nanocomposites could be used as possible materials for the prevention and treatment of denture stomatitis, due to their antibiofilm activities.