Histopathologic grading of breast cancer; large variation with major consequences?

• Published in: Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde Vol. 164
• Main Authors: van Dooijeweert, C, Baas, I O, Deckers, I A G, van der Wall, E, van Diest, P J
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Dutch
• Published: Netherlands 14.01.2021
• ISSN: 0028-2162; 1876-8784

The pathologist's assessment of tumor tissue plays a critical role in therapeutic decision-making in early-stage invasive breast cancer. In daily practice, however, there appears to be considerable variation in grading between the different Dutch pathology laboratories and between individual pathologists within the same laboratory. This underlines the need to standardize grading by pathologists as much as possible in order to minimize the risk of a worse outcome for patients due to under-treatment and of unnecessary toxicity from over-treatment. Therefore, two initiatives were launched, i.e. laboratory-specific feedback reports and an e-learning module in which pathologists were trained in grading of invasive breast cancer. While these initiatives have yielded encouraging results, the overall variation in grading remains significant. Awareness of this variation, and of the inherent difficulties of subjective grading, among the various clinicians involved in breast cancer management, is therefore of utmost importance to improve clinical decision-making for patients.