Characterization of Co and Fe-MCM-56 catalysts for NH 3 -SCR and N 2 O decomposition: An in situ FTIR study
Two-step preparation of iron and cobalt-containing MCM-56 zeolites has been undertaken to evaluate the influence of their physicochemical properties in the selective catalytic reduction (NH -SCR or DeNOx) of NO using NH as a reductant. Zeolites were prepared by the selective leaching of the framewor...
Saved in:
Published in | Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy Vol. 196; p. 281 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
05.05.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Two-step preparation of iron and cobalt-containing MCM-56 zeolites has been undertaken to evaluate the influence of their physicochemical properties in the selective catalytic reduction (NH
-SCR or DeNOx) of NO using NH
as a reductant. Zeolites were prepared by the selective leaching of the framework cations by concentrated HNO
solution and NH
F/HF mixture and consecutively, introduction of Co and Fe heteroatoms, in quantities below 1wt%. Further calcination allowed to obtain highly dispersed active species. Their evaluation and speciation was realized by adsorption of pyridine and NO, followed by FTIR spectroscopy. Both Fe-MCM-56 zeolites showed excellent activities (maximum NO conversion 92%) with high selectivity to dinitrogen (above 99%) in the high temperature NH
-SCR process. High catalytic activity of Fe-MCM-56 zeolites was assigned to the formation of stable nitrates, delivering NO to react with NH
at higher temperatures and suppressing the direct NO oxidation. It was found that more nitrates was formed in Fe-MCM-56 (HNO
) than in Fe-MCM-56 (HF/NH
F) and that could compensate for the lower Fe loading, resulting in very similar catalytic activity of both catalysts. At the same time both Co-and Fe-MCM-56 zeolites were moderately active in direct N
O decomposition, with maximum N
O conversion not higher than 80% and activity window starting at 500°C. This phenomenon was expected since both types of catalysts contained well dispersed active centers, not beneficial for this reaction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-3557 |