Federal inmates a litigious lot
Scores of other felons are demanding judicial reviews of CSC and National Parole Board staff decisions they allege stomp on their constitutional rights. These include the denial of a religious diet, errors in calculating release dates, unwarranted disciplinary actions and libelous statements in CSC...
Saved in:
Published in | CanWest News p. 1 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Newsletter |
Language | English |
Published |
Don Mills, Ont
Postmedia Network Inc
01.04.2006
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Scores of other felons are demanding judicial reviews of CSC and National Parole Board staff decisions they allege stomp on their constitutional rights. These include the denial of a religious diet, errors in calculating release dates, unwarranted disciplinary actions and libelous statements in CSC staff reports. Probably the busiest criminal is Albert Duterville, a Maritimer who, between 2003 and 2005, filed 26 legal beefs against CSC, including a claim for $55,000 for injuries inflicted by co-mates and demands for a review of a decision not to let him phone his son or send out mail within 24 hours. |
---|