Residual DI or 'own occ': Can you be comfortable recommending either?
A long-term own occ definition of total disability has always had more sales appeal than logical insurance credibility. The own occ product certainly took center stage for many years-ahead of the residual DI, a policy that seemed to have a more solid basis in helping someone in proportion to the los...
Saved in:
Published in | National Underwriter Vol. 105; no. 10; p. 14 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Trade Publication Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Erlanger
ALM Media Properties, LLC
05.03.2001
|
Edition | Life, health/financial services ed. |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A long-term own occ definition of total disability has always had more sales appeal than logical insurance credibility. The own occ product certainly took center stage for many years-ahead of the residual DI, a policy that seemed to have a more solid basis in helping someone in proportion to the loss of income felt due to disability. But a policy that only pays a benefit based on loss of earnings could not compare to a plan that pays a total benefit plus any money one can earn in another profession. Also, a residual policy costs more than a stand-alone own occ policy. But insurers soon packaged the 2 together, so that the disabled insured could access residual benefits if he or she returned to his or her own practice. That packaging of the 2 seemed to answer all questions for those who could afford the cost of the two-benefits-in-one product. Unfortunately, the own occ claim gets more press, but there are problems with residual disability, too. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1940-1345 |