Suit over land at center of storm dismissed;Lawyer says annexation battle between Summerville, N. Charleston not affected FINAL Edition

A suit over a parcel that North Charleston wanted to use to annex Watson Hill was dismissed Friday, but North Charleston's attorney said that won't affect the outcome of North Charleston and Summerville's annexation lawsuit over the same tract. Dismissing the [Mickey Barry] suit won&#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe post and courier
Main Author DAVE MUNDAY AND WARREN WISE
Format Newspaper Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Charleston, S.C The Post and Courier 19.12.2006
Subjects
Barry, Mickey
Lam, Richard
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:A suit over a parcel that North Charleston wanted to use to annex Watson Hill was dismissed Friday, but North Charleston's attorney said that won't affect the outcome of North Charleston and Summerville's annexation lawsuit over the same tract. Dismissing the [Mickey Barry] suit won't affect the annexation lawsuit one way or another, North Charleston Deputy Attorney Derk Van Raalte said. Dismissing the Barry lawsuit means that four local conservation groups who pledged $250,000 each to cover any damages the Barrys might incur are off the hook. The Coastal Conservation League, Drayton Hall, the Middleton Place Foundation and the Historic Charleston Foundation pledged a total of $1 million.
ISSN:1061-5105