A safe, sane policy National Edition

• Published in: National post (Toronto)
• Main Author: Keith R. Solomon and Ron Harris
• Format: Newspaper Article
• Language: English
• Published: Don Mills, Ont Postmedia Network Inc 21.05.2003
• Subjects: Agriculture; Chemicals; Pest control; Pesticides; Regulation
• ISSN: 1486-8008

Not all pesticides are the same. The definition of a pesticide is very broad; more than 700 pesticides are registered for control of pests such as insects, diseases, weeds and rodents. These substances have a wide spectrum of chemical and biological properties and are used in agriculture and forestry, in urban and marine environments, and for protection of human health. Even swimming pool chemicals are classed as pesticides, as are the naturally occurring pesticides such as pyrethrins, rotenone and biological control agents favored by organic growers. In Ontario, pesticides have long been subject to further review and regulation under the Pesticide Act. This is done by Ministry scientists and the Ontario pesticides advisory committee, a group of highly qualified environmental scientists, medical doctors, pest management specialists and private individuals who report to the Minister of the Environment. This committee is responsible for classifying pesticides for use in Ontario. There is a better way. Modern pest management programs are built around the concept of integrated pest management (IPM) using a combination of non-chemical and chemical pest control methods. While chemicals are an important component of IPM programs, it is sensible to use them only when necessary. Ontario became a world leader in 1987 when the government initiated a 15-year program aimed at reducing agricultural pesticide use by 50%, while still achieving effective pest control. This program -- involving research and extension specialists, grower organizations and the chemical industry -- has been a remarkable success.