It's enough to undermine you Clay soil, trees and tricky insurers. Belinda Beresford on the perils of subsidence
Is it fair that insurers penalise us if our house has had subsidence in the past? And should a home in a subsidence-prone area automatically be charged higher insurance premiums? Chris Jordan of the Subsidence Claims Advisory Bureau thinks not: "It's grossly unfair. It's not climate a...
Saved in:
Published in | The Guardian (London) |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Newspaper Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London (UK)
Guardian News & Media Limited
30.05.1998
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Is it fair that insurers penalise us if our house has had subsidence in the past? And should a home in a subsidence-prone area automatically be charged higher insurance premiums? Chris Jordan of the Subsidence Claims Advisory Bureau thinks not: "It's grossly unfair. It's not climate and clay that causes subsidence it is clay, climate and another factor, usually a tree. When that is professionally lopped the problem often goes." He adds that there are parts of North London where policyholders pay double the average in premiums - pounds 4 for every pounds 1,000 of building cover -even if their home is in first-class condition. Insurers are fearful of serial subsidence claims and may raise premiums and excesses, even when houses have been professionally treated and the work carries a guarantee. Such subsidence stigma can be out of all proportion to the actual or potential damage to a house. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0261-3077 |