Konkrete Theorie : Bemerkungen eines praktizierenden Architekten zum Verhältnis von Architekturtheorie und Wissenschaft

Architectural theory should not treat the relation of various scientific fields to architecture, but has to explore the nature of architecture itself. Architectural theory that moreover claims an immediate practical value for architectural design would have to coincide with the very act of conceivin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWolkenkuckucksheim : internationale Zeitschrift fur Theorie und Wissenschaft der Architektur/Cloud-Cuckoo-Land : international journal of architectural theory Vol. 13
Main Author Janson, Alban
Format Journal Article
LanguageGerman
Published 01.03.2009
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Architectural theory should not treat the relation of various scientific fields to architecture, but has to explore the nature of architecture itself. Architectural theory that moreover claims an immediate practical value for architectural design would have to coincide with the very act of conceiving. Such a theory has to be examined in respect of its relationship to science. Unlike sciences, which describe the existing reality claiming general validity, an architectural theory with relevance for the architectonic practice has to take into consideration that any architectonic project counts only for one single situation. Every time it represents something new that cannot be deduced. Regarding this it will be proposed to apply to architecture the method of abduction described by Ch. S. Peirce, besides demonstrating the scientific character of architectural design (according to Achim Hahn). In order to ascertain precisely the notion of architecture being the subject of design its characteristic properties have to be specified carefully. [Publication Abstract]
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1434-0984