Imperatives in Concessive Clauses: Compatibility between Constructions

• Published in: Constructions (Düsseldorf, Germany) Vol. 2; pp. 1 - 39
• Main Author: Takahashi, Hidemitsu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.01.2008
• ISSN: 1860-2010; 1860-2010

In his pioneering paper on "Performative Subordinate Clauses," Lakoff (1984) claimed that subordinate clauses expressing a reason or concession allow imperatives conveying statements (i.e., assertive illocutionary force). While this analysis has gone unchallenged to this day, the present paper shows that Lakoff's analysis is inadequate, in that reason & concessive clauses show a sharp contrast in the kinds of imperative utterances they permit. Contra Lakoff, concessive clauses with although, though & except (that) do allow imperative constructions conveying directive illocutionary forces to occur, whereas by contrast those with even though tend to disallow both types of imperatives. These findings can be explained in terms of compatibility between "component" constructions constituting a complex sentence. It is argued that the compatibility between imperatives (both directive & assertive types) & concessive adverbials (excluding even though) can be attributed to the latter's loose integration into a matrix clause required by the former. Furthermore, it is argued that the incompatibility of even though with imperatives arises primarily from the incompatibility between the tight integration of even though & the loose integration required by imperatives, together with the associated incompatibility between the non-rectifying function of even though and the rectifying conjunction favored by imperatives. Adapted from the source document