Magnetic resonance tensors in Uracil: Calculation of super(13)C, super(15)N, super(17)O NMR chemical shifts, super(17)O and super(14)N electric field gradients and measurement of super(13)C and super(15)N chemical shifts
The experimental super(13)C NMR chemical shift components of uracil in the solid state are reported for the first time (to our knowledge), as well as newer data for the super(15)N nuclei. These experimental values are supported by extensive calculated data of the super(13)C, super(15)N and super(17)...
Saved in:
Published in | Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance Vol. 37; no. 1-2; pp. 13 - 20 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.04.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The experimental super(13)C NMR chemical shift components of uracil in the solid state are reported for the first time (to our knowledge), as well as newer data for the super(15)N nuclei. These experimental values are supported by extensive calculated data of the super(13)C, super(15)N and super(17)O chemical shielding and super(17)O and super(14)N electric field gradient (EFG) tensors. In the crystal, uracil forms a number of strong and weak hydrogen bonds, and the effect of these on the super(13)C and super(15)N chemical shift tensors is studied. This powerful combination of the structural methods and theoretical calculations gives a very detailed view of the strong and weak hydrogen bond formation by this molecule. Good calculated results for the optimized cluster in most cases (except for the EFG values of the super(14)N3 and super(17)O4 nuclei) certify the accuracy of our optimized coordinates for the hydrogen nuclei. Our reported RMSD values for the calculated chemical shielding and EFG tensors are smaller than those reported previously. In the optimized cluster the 6-311+G** basis set is the optimal one in the chemical shielding and EFG calculations, except for the EFG calculations of the oxygen nuclei, in which the 6-31+G** basis set is the optimal one. The optimal method for the chemical shielding and EFG calculations of the oxygen and nitrogen nuclei is the PW91PW91 method, while for the chemical shielding calculations of the super(13)C nuclei the B3LYP method gives the best results. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0926-2040 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2009.12.001 |