Metabolic tumor volume from baseline 18 FFDG PET/CT at diagnosis improves the IPI stratification in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

• Published in: Annals of hematology
• Main Authors: Zhang, Hanzhen, Xu, Zihan, Zhou, Wenlan, Chen, Junjie, Wei, Yongqiang, Wu, Hubing, Wei, Xiaolei, Feng, Ru
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 02.09.2024
• ISSN: 1432-0584; 1432-0584
• DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05717-9

Although several different parameters of PET/CT were reported to be predictive of survival in DLBCL, the best parameter remains to be elucidated and whether it could improve the risk stratification of IPI in patients with DLBCL.PURPOSEAlthough several different parameters of PET/CT were reported to be predictive of survival in DLBCL, the best parameter remains to be elucidated and whether it could improve the risk stratification of IPI in patients with DLBCL.262 DLBCL patients including in the training and validation cohort were retrospectively analyzed in this study.PROCEDURES262 DLBCL patients including in the training and validation cohort were retrospectively analyzed in this study.Among different parameters, MTV was identified as the optimal prognostic parameter with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.652 ± 0.112 than TLG and SDmax (0.645 ± 0.113 and 0.600 ± 0.117, respectively). Patients with high MTV were associated with inferior PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) in both the training and validation cohort. The multivariate analysis revealed that high MTV was an unfavorable factor for PFS (relative ratio [RR], 2.295; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.457-3.615; p < 0.01) and OS (RR, 2.929; 95% CI 1.679-5.109; p < 0.01) independent of IPI.RESULTSAmong different parameters, MTV was identified as the optimal prognostic parameter with a maximum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.652 ± 0.112 than TLG and SDmax (0.645 ± 0.113 and 0.600 ± 0.117, respectively). Patients with high MTV were associated with inferior PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) in both the training and validation cohort. The multivariate analysis revealed that high MTV was an unfavorable factor for PFS (relative ratio [RR], 2.295; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.457-3.615; p < 0.01) and OS (RR, 2.929; 95% CI 1.679-5.109; p < 0.01) independent of IPI.Further analysis showed MTV could improve the risk stratification of IPI for both PFS and OS (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, our study suggests that MTV was an optimal prognostic parameter of PET/CT for survival and it could improve the risk stratification of IPI in DLBCL, which may help to guide treatment in clinical trial.CONCLUSIONSFurther analysis showed MTV could improve the risk stratification of IPI for both PFS and OS (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, our study suggests that MTV was an optimal prognostic parameter of PET/CT for survival and it could improve the risk stratification of IPI in DLBCL, which may help to guide treatment in clinical trial.