Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy

To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.PurposeTo review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT Vol. 9; no. 2; p. 121
Main Authors Ali, Naba, Zhou, Jun, Eaton, Bree R, Switchenko, Jeffrey M, Cao, Yichun, Stokes, William A, Patel, Pretesh R, Langen, Katja M, Slopsema, Roelf, Bradley, Jeffrey D, McDonald, Mark W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.PurposeTo review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).Patients and methodsFrom Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.ResultsAll treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.ConclusionProton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:2156-4647
2156-4647