The efficacy and safety of low-energy carbon dioxide fractional laser use in the treatment of early-stage pediatric hypertrophic scars: A prospective, randomized, split-scar study

BACKGROUNDVarious laser therapies have been introduced in scar management. However, pain during treatment has limited the application of laser therapy in pediatrics. OBJECTIVESTo evaluate whether the use of the low-energy mode of a carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser improves hypertrophic scars in a pediatr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLasers in surgery and medicine Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 230 - 236
Main Authors Won, TaeHo, Ma, QianYu, Chen, ZongAn, Gao, Zhen, Wu, XiaoLi, Zhang, RuHong
Format Report
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.02.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUNDVarious laser therapies have been introduced in scar management. However, pain during treatment has limited the application of laser therapy in pediatrics. OBJECTIVESTo evaluate whether the use of the low-energy mode of a carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser improves hypertrophic scars in a pediatric population. METHODSThis prospective, randomized, split-scar trial was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of low-energy CO2 laser use. Patients aged <12 years with hypertrophic scars were enrolled. Each hypertrophic scar was equally divided into three parts: the two ends of each scar were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups, and the center portion was considered a transition zone and was not included in the analysis. A total of three laser treatments were performed at 1-month intervals. Scar scale scores 6 months after the final treatment was the primary outcome. Additionally, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain after each treatment. RESULTSOf the 23 patients enrolled, 20 completed the study. The total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score at the 6-month follow-up was significantly lower for the treated site (44.95 for the treated group vs. 64.85 for the control group, p < 0.0001). Both the patient and observer POSAS scores showed an obvious difference between the treated and control groups (19.95 vs. 29.95 for patient scores, respectively, p < 0.0001, and 26.00 vs. 34.90 for observer scores, respectively, p < 0.0001). All observer and patient scores describing pain, pruritus, color, stiffness, and thickness were statistically different and favored the treated site. No significant difference was found in patient score of irregularity. The average VAS therapeutic pain score was 3.5 ± 1.43 out of 10. CONCLUSIONSLow-energy CO2 fractional laser therapy improved hypertrophic scars in a pediatric population. Therefore, for children with hypertrophic scar, low-energy CO2 laser with less procedure pain may be more appropriate.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Case Study-4
content type line 59
SourceType-Reports-1
ObjectType-Report-3
ISSN:1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.23459