The repetitive motion un-rule

As one of the Bush administration's first substantive pieces of legislation, hard-won ergonomic protections were yanked away from workers after business opponents, including the National Association of Manufacturers and the US Chamber of Commerce, convinced their Congressional allies to rescind...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultinational monitor Vol. 22; no. 5; p. 8
Main Author Weinstock, Deborah
Format Magazine Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington Multinational Monitor 01.05.2001
Subjects
Chao, Elaine
Cost control
Employers
Ergonomics
Federal regulation
Meat industry
Occupational safety
Personal profiles
Presidents
Repetitive motion disorders
Safety standards
Workers
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:As one of the Bush administration's first substantive pieces of legislation, hard-won ergonomic protections were yanked away from workers after business opponents, including the National Association of Manufacturers and the US Chamber of Commerce, convinced their Congressional allies to rescind the new worker protection rules. A brief profile of Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao is presented.
Bibliography:content type line 24
ObjectType-Feature-1
SourceType-Magazines-1
ISSN:0197-4637
2163-5285