Genetic variation in IFN signaling is associated with responsiveness to IFN-b in multiple sclerosis

Background: Previously, we showed that baseline status of the IFN type-I activity negatively correlates with pharmacological effects of IFN-b treatment. Objective: It is hypothesized that inter-individual differences in the IFN type-I response program at baseline, and concomitant variation in IFN-b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultiple sclerosis Vol. 14; p. S291
Main Authors Vosslamber, S, van der Voort, LF, van Baarsen, L, Heijmans, R, Crusius, JBA, Killestein, J, Polman, C, Verweij, CL
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.09.2008
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Previously, we showed that baseline status of the IFN type-I activity negatively correlates with pharmacological effects of IFN-b treatment. Objective: It is hypothesized that inter-individual differences in the IFN type-I response program at baseline, and concomitant variation in IFN-b responsiveness may be the result of inter-individual variation in IFN-b biology. In this study we investigated the role of genetic variation in IFN signaling components in relation to heterogeneous pharmacological response to IFN-b. Methods: To determine biological response, peripheral blood was collected from 30 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients before and during IFN-b therapy. From 20 untreated RRMS patients peripheral blood was collected at two time points over a 3 to 12 month time period to analyze stability of baseline values over time. Baseline stability and biological response-rate, were analyzed by Taqman low-density arrays using the mean gene-expression level of a set of 10 IFN type-I response genes. Genetic variation was determined in several components of the IFN signaling cascade using Taqman genotyping assays and conventional genomic polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The ratios of gene-expression levels before and during therapy were compared with occurrence of genetic variation in components of the IFN signaling pathway. Results: The extent of biological response correlated negatively with baseline expression of the type-I IFN response gene-set (R=-0.3891; p=0.0336). Baseline stability over time was reflected by a correlation efficient of r=0.54; P=0.029 (n=20). Next we determined the association of genetic variation in IFN signalling components with IFN type-I response gene activity at baseline and after pharmacological intervention with IFN-b. This analysis revealed a significant association between genetic variation in one of the IFN signaling components and baseline IFN type-I response gene expression (P=0.0198). Accordingly, a significant reduced biological response was observed for patients who contained the genetic variant (P=0.0057). Conclusions: Variation in IFN signaling may determine (part) of the heterogeneity in pharmacological and clinical response to IFN-b in RRMS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1352-4585