CO sub(2) data on gas and pore water sampled in situ in the Opalinus Clay at the Mont Terri rock laboratory

Since 1996, experimental and modeling approaches have led to the understanding of the main mechanisms controlling the Opalinus Clay pore water composition. By 2003, one of the main remaining uncertainties concerned the carbonate system. Consequently, to reduce this uncertainty, an innovative device...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics and chemistry of the earth. Parts A/B/C Vol. 33; pp. S54 - S60
Main Authors Vinsot, A, Appelo, CAJ, Cailteau, C, Wechner, S, Pironon, J, De Donato, P, De Canniere, P, Mettler, S, Wersin, P, Gabler, HE
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2008
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Since 1996, experimental and modeling approaches have led to the understanding of the main mechanisms controlling the Opalinus Clay pore water composition. By 2003, one of the main remaining uncertainties concerned the carbonate system. Consequently, to reduce this uncertainty, an innovative device for pore water sampling was implemented in 2004 in the Mont Terri Rock Laboratory. An ascending borehole was dry-drilled, using only N sub(2) gas and aseptic tools to avoid rock oxidation and microbiological perturbation. The borehole equipment allowed the circulation of gas, initially pure argon, in contact with the rock in a closed circuit and the sampling of formation water produced in the test interval. This experiment made it possible to monitor the composition of the circulating gas over several months and to collect seepage water at a flow rate close to 3mL/day over more than 3 years. The sampled water composition remained stable over time and coherent with the previous understanding. CO sub(2) partial pressures calculated from water analyses are between 10 super(-) super(2) super(.) super(4) and 10 super(-) super(1) super(.) super(7)bar. Modeling of the evolution of CO sub(2) concentration in the circulating gas involved advection, diffusion, calcite precipitation and proton buffering surface processes. CO sub(2) partial pressure deduced from water analyses is a few mbars higher than that measured on the gas. Calcium carbonate precipitation and capillary effects could explain this discrepancy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1474-7065
DOI:10.1016/j.pce.2008.10.050