18F-FDG PET/contrast enhanced CT in the standard follow-up of patients with lymphoma
AIMTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/contrast enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences in patients with lymphoma. MATERIAL AND METHODSPatients with lymphoma and clinical complete remission underwent 18F-FDG PET/ceCT for standard follow-up.18F-FD...
Saved in:
Published in | Revista Española de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular (English ed.) Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 151 - 155 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English Spanish |
Published |
01.05.2018
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | AIMTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/contrast enhanced computed tomography (ceCT) in the detection of asymptomatic recurrences in patients with lymphoma. MATERIAL AND METHODSPatients with lymphoma and clinical complete remission underwent 18F-FDG PET/ceCT for standard follow-up.18F-FDG PET and ceCT were evaluated blindly by two independent observers, and classified as positive or negative for recurrence. Additionally a combined evaluation of both techniques was performed. The final diagnosis was established by histopathological analysis or a clinical follow-up longer than 6 months. Statistical diagnostic parameters and concordance levels between both diagnostic techniques were calculated. RESULTSA total of 114 explorations on 90 patients were analyzed. Only 4 patients were diagnosed as asymptomatic recurrence during the follow-up. 18F-FDG PET/ceCT, 18F-FDG PET and ceCT showed an association with the final diagnosis (p=0.002 and χ2=11.96; p<0.001 and χ2=15.60; p=0.001 and χ2=11.96, respectively). The concordance between 18F-FDG PET and ceCT was moderate/high and significant (kappa=0.672; p<0.001). A sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 88% was obtained for the 18F-FDG PET/ceCT civ, 50% and 93% for the 18F-FDG PET, and 50% and 91% for the ceCT. CONCLUSIONThe combined use of 18F-FDG PET/ceCT did not offer any advantage compared to any isolated diagnostic technique in the detection of asymptomatic lymphoma recurrence. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-1 |
ISSN: | 2253-8089 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.remn.2017.09.003 |