Is the U.S. about to ‘cheat’ on the Iran nuclear deal? Here’s how this could backfire Issuing sanctions while Iran is in compliance would be a U.S. violation of the JCPOA
The JCPOA includes some of the most intrusive monitoring provisions used in arms control, including on-site inspections and continuous monitoring of some facilities. In a new working paper, Andrew Coe and I argue that in designing monitoring for an arms control agreement, states face a trade-off bet...
Saved in:
Published in | Washington Post – Blogs |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Newspaper Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Washington
WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post
17.10.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The JCPOA includes some of the most intrusive monitoring provisions used in arms control, including on-site inspections and continuous monitoring of some facilities. In a new working paper, Andrew Coe and I argue that in designing monitoring for an arms control agreement, states face a trade-off between having enough transparency to observe compliance and needing sufficient safety from observation that could jeopardize their security. If Iran decides that information sharing in a current nuclear agreement will leave the regime more vulnerable in the future, including beyond the nuclear context, Tehran will have few reasons to renegotiate the deal. Because of this trade-off, states have to make compromises to get an arms control agreement. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Blog-1 SourceType-Blogs, Podcasts, & Websites-1 content type line 39 |