Is the U.S. about to ‘cheat’ on the Iran nuclear deal? Here’s how this could backfire Issuing sanctions while Iran is in compliance would be a U.S. violation of the JCPOA

The JCPOA includes some of the most intrusive monitoring provisions used in arms control, including on-site inspections and continuous monitoring of some facilities. In a new working paper, Andrew Coe and I argue that in designing monitoring for an arms control agreement, states face a trade-off bet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWashington Post – Blogs
Main Author Vaynman, Jane
Format Newspaper Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington WP Company LLC d/b/a The Washington Post 17.10.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The JCPOA includes some of the most intrusive monitoring provisions used in arms control, including on-site inspections and continuous monitoring of some facilities. In a new working paper, Andrew Coe and I argue that in designing monitoring for an arms control agreement, states face a trade-off between having enough transparency to observe compliance and needing sufficient safety from observation that could jeopardize their security. If Iran decides that information sharing in a current nuclear agreement will leave the regime more vulnerable in the future, including beyond the nuclear context, Tehran will have few reasons to renegotiate the deal. Because of this trade-off, states have to make compromises to get an arms control agreement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Blog-1
SourceType-Blogs, Podcasts, & Websites-1
content type line 39