Reliability and Discriminative Ability of a New Method for Soccer Kicking Evaluation: e0147998

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 11; no. 1
• Main Authors: Radman, Ivan, Wessner, Barbara, Bachl, Norbert, Ruzic, Lana, Hackl, Markus, Baca, Arnold, Markovic, Goran
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.01.2016
• ISSN: 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147998

The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a newly developed 356 Soccer Shooting Test (356-SST), and the discriminative ability of this test with respect to the soccer players' proficiency level and leg dominance. Sixty-six male soccer players, divided into three groups based on their proficiency level (amateur, n = 24; novice semi-professional, n = 18; and experienced semi-professional players, n = 24), performed 10 kicks following a two-step run up. Forty-eight of them repeated the test on a separate day. The following shooting variables were derived: ball velocity (BV; measured via radar gun), shooting accuracy (SA; average distance from the ball-entry point to the goal centre), and shooting quality (SQ; shooting accuracy divided by the time elapsed from hitting the ball to the point of entry). No systematic bias was evident in the selected shooting variables (SA: 1.98 plus or minus 0.65 vs. 2.00 plus or minus 0.63 m; BV: 24.6 plus or minus 2.3 vs. 24.5 plus or minus 1.9 m s-1; SQ: 2.92 plus or minus 1.0 vs. 2.93 plus or minus 1.0 m s-1; all p>0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficients were high (ICC = 0.70-0.88), and the coefficients of variation were low (CV = 5.3-5.4%). Finally, all three 356-SST variables identify, with adequate sensitivity, differences in soccer shooting ability with respect to the players' proficiency and leg dominance. The results suggest that the 356-SST is a reliable and sensitive test of specific shooting ability in men's soccer. Future studies should test the validity of these findings in a fatigued state, as well as in other populations.