Development and Validation of a Novel Method to Derive Central Aortic Systolic Pressure From the Radial Pressure Waveform Using an N-Point Moving Average Method: Vascular Disease

Objectives The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the novel application of a simple n-point moving average (NPMA)-a mathematical low pass filter-to noninvasively derive central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) from the radial artery pressure waveform (RAPWF) in humans. Background CASP...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 57; no. 8; pp. 951 - 961
Main Authors Williams, Bryan, Lacy, Peter S, Yan, Peter, Hwee, Chua-Ngak, Liang, Chen, Ting, Choon-Meng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.02.2011
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the novel application of a simple n-point moving average (NPMA)-a mathematical low pass filter-to noninvasively derive central aortic systolic pressure (CASP) from the radial artery pressure waveform (RAPWF) in humans. Background CASP may be an important independent determinant of clinical outcomes. Development of simple, well-validated methods to noninvasively derive CASP is necessary to facilitate the routine clinical measurement of CASP. Methods Three studies in different population cohorts were used to develop and validate the NPMA method to derive CASP in humans: 1) a development study (n = 217), describing the optimal application of the NPMA to derive CASP; 2) a validation study comparing NPMA-CASP with CASP derived using a generalized transfer function (GTF-CASP [SphygmoCor system, AtCor, Sydney, Australia]) using 5,349 RAPWFs from the CAFE (Conduit Artery Function Evaluation) study; and 3) an invasive validation study (n = 20) comparing NPMA-CASP with direct aortic root pressure measurements during cardiac catheterization. Results In the development study, when using the NPMA, a denominator of n/4 (where n = tonometer sampling frequency) most accurately defined CASP relative to GTF-CASP. Validation of NPMA-CASP using RAPWFs from the CAFE study revealed excellent correlation and agreement (r2 = 0.993, mean difference 0.3 plus or minus 1.0 mm Hg). The agreement remained robust after stratification by sex, age, treatment, and diabetes status. There was also excellent correlation and agreement (r2 = 0.98, p < 0.001) between directly measured aortic root systolic pressures (Millar's catheter) at cardiac catheterization versus NPMA-CASP, derived simultaneously from noninvasive RAPWFs. Conclusions We show that an NPMA with a denominator of one-quarter of the tonometer sampling frequency accurately defines CASP when applied to noninvasively acquired RAPWFs in man. These novel findings have important implications for the simplification of noninvasive CASP measurement and its wider application in clinical trials and clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0735-1097
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.054