A new wide-angle arthroscopic system: a comparative study with a conventional 30 degree arthroscopic system

To compare users' hand movements in performing validated shoulder arthroscopic tasks between a 30 degree and a wide-angle arthroscopic system, using phantom models with an optical motion analysis system. Twelve orthopaedic residents were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. In order...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 1722 - 1729
Main Authors Jung, Kyunghwa, Kang, Dong-Ju, Kekatpure, Aashay L, Adikrishna, Arnold, Hong, Jaesung, Jeon, In-Ho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.05.2016
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare users' hand movements in performing validated shoulder arthroscopic tasks between a 30 degree and a wide-angle arthroscopic system, using phantom models with an optical motion analysis system. Twelve orthopaedic residents were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. In order to compensate for any learning effect, a Latin square counterbalancing technique was used. An optical motion analysis system was used with markers affixed to pre-designed sites; each participant conducted four validated shoulder arthroscopic tasks using both arthroscopic systems. Each participant was instructed to perform the experiment three times with each arthroscope. The time taken, total path length, number of movements, and average acceleration were analysed. Significant differences were observed for the time taken, number of movements, and average acceleration between the two arthroscopic systems (P < 0.05 for all). However, the time taken was not significant. The mean total path length measured 53 plus or minus 38 cm with the 30 degree arthroscope, while the mean with the wide-angle arthroscope was significantly shorter, at 36 plus or minus 22 cm. The mean number of movements with the 30 degree and wide-angle arthroscopes were 1974 plus or minus 1305 and 1233 plus or minus 990, respectively, while the average accelerations were 2.6 plus or minus 1.3 and 1.2 plus or minus 0.6 cm/s super(2), respectively. The mean time taken was 13 % faster when using the wide-angle arthroscopic system, although this was not statistically significant. The wide-angle arthroscopic system improved the arthroscope manoeuvre in terms of the total path length, number of movements, and average acceleration required for experimental arthroscopy. This system may help surgeons triangulate the arthroscope and surgical instruments during surgery by expanding the field of view.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-015-3967-z