Isolation and characterization of estuarine dissolved organic matter: Comparison of ultrafiltration and C sub(1) sub(8) solid-phase extraction techniques
Characterization of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from aquatic environments has always been constrained by the ability to obtain a representative fraction of the DOM pool for analysis. Ultrafiltration or extraction, commonly using XAD or C sub(1) sub(8) sorbents, is therefore generally used to conc...
Saved in:
Published in | Marine chemistry Vol. 96; no. 3-4; pp. 219 - 235 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
01.09.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Characterization of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from aquatic environments has always been constrained by the ability to obtain a representative fraction of the DOM pool for analysis. Ultrafiltration or extraction, commonly using XAD or C sub(1) sub(8) sorbents, is therefore generally used to concentrate and desalt DOM samples for further analyses. In this study, we compared ultrafiltration and C sub(1) sub(8) solid-phase extraction disks (SPE) as DOM isolation methods for estuarine samples. We also evaluated the use of the C sub(1) sub(8) SPE disks to isolate low-molecular-weight DOM (LMW-DOM) in the filtrate from ultrafiltration. The isolates from both methods and the LMW-DOM C sub(1) sub(8)-extracts were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and direct temperature-resolved mass spectrometry (DT-MS). Based on mass balance and blank measurements, we found that the C sub(1) sub(8) SPE disks can be used to isolate bulk DOM and LMW-DOM from estuarine samples. FTIR and DT-MS analysis show that C sub(1) sub(8)-extracted DOM and ultrafiltered high-molecular-weight DOM (HMW-DOM) differ markedly in chemical composition. The HMW-DOM is enriched in (degraded) polysaccharides along with aminosugars when compared with the C sub(1) sub(8)-extracted DOM. The C sub(1) sub(8)-extracted DOM appears enriched in aromatic compounds, probably from lignin and/or aromatic amino acids in proteins. C sub(1) sub(8) SPE of LMW-DOM samples from ultrafiltration increases the recovery of DOM from the total sample up to about 70%, compared to around 50% using ultrafiltration alone. Thus, a majority of the DOM can be isolated from estuarine samples by a combination of these techniques. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0304-4203 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.marchem.2005.01.003 |