Worldwide proficiency test for routine analysis of [delta] super(2)H and [delta] super(18)O in water by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry and laser absorption spectroscopy

RATIONALE The interpretation of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope data in isotope hydrology relies on accurate, high-precision analytical measurements of the super(2)H: super(1)H and super(18)O: super(16)O ratios in liquid H sub(2)O samples. METHODS A synthesis of the International Atomic Energy Ag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRapid communications in mass spectrometry Vol. 26; no. 15; pp. 1641 - 1648
Main Authors Wassenaar, LI, Ahmad, M, Aggarwal, P, Duren, M, Poltenstein, L, Araguas, L, Kurttas, T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.08.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:RATIONALE The interpretation of stable hydrogen and oxygen isotope data in isotope hydrology relies on accurate, high-precision analytical measurements of the super(2)H: super(1)H and super(18)O: super(16)O ratios in liquid H sub(2)O samples. METHODS A synthesis of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) worldwide proficiency test for analytical laboratories conducting routine analysis of [delta] super(2)H and [delta] super(18)O values in water (WICO2011) by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) and laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS) technology has been carried out. RESULTS This test revealed that >96% of the 160 laboratory submissions provided acceptable results within plus or minus 2ppt for [delta] super(2)H values and plus or minus 0.2ppt for [delta] super(18)O values of the established reference values for four test waters, and no difference in outcomes based on IRMS vs. LAS technology was found for good performing laboratories. CONCLUSIONS The leading cause of outliers appeared to be improper calibration or compromised storage of laboratory standard and primary reference waters; hence the importance of judicious storage of lab standards cannot be understated. The deprecated practice of single standard normalization was identified as a problem for some laboratories. We further recommend that laboratories strive to report parsimonious long-term precisions based upon control standards, and to improve quantification and correction for LAS instrumental drift and inter-sample carryover effects. Copyright [copy 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0951-4198
1097-0231
DOI:10.1002/rcm.6270