Long-term follow-up after percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main stenosis in high risk patients not suitable for bypass surgery

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVESPercutaneous coronary intervention is recommended in patients with unprotected left main stenosis non suitable for coronary artery bypass graft. Long-term follow-up of those patients remains uncertain.METHODSAll patients with de novo unprotected left main stenosis treated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista española de cardiología (English ed.) Vol. 65; no. 6; pp. 530 - 537
Main Authors Gómez-Hospital, Joan Antoni, Gomez-Lara, Josep, Rondan, Juan, Homs, Silvia, Lozano Martínez-Luengas, Iñigo, Ferreiro, Jose Luís, Roura, Gerard, Maristany, Jaume, Teruel, Luis, Carro, Amelia, Avanzas, Pablo, Jara, Paco, Esplugas, Enric, Moris, Cesar, Cequier, Angel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.06.2012
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVESPercutaneous coronary intervention is recommended in patients with unprotected left main stenosis non suitable for coronary artery bypass graft. Long-term follow-up of those patients remains uncertain.METHODSAll patients with de novo unprotected left main stenosis treated with stent implantation were consecutively enrolled. Percutaneous coronary intervention was indicated according to the standards of care, taking into account clinical and anatomical conditions unfavorable for coronary artery bypass graft. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.RESULTSOf 226 consecutive patients included, 202 (89.4%) were treated with drug-eluting stents. Mean age was 72.1 years, 41.1% had renal dysfunction, and mean Syntax score and EuroSCORE were 28.9 and 7.4, respectively. Angiographic and procedural success was achieved in 99.6% and 92.9% of patients. At 3 years, the rates of major adverse cardiac events, death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were 36.2%, 25.2%, 8.4%, 8.0%, respectively. Target lesion revascularization was more frequently observed when ≥ 2 stents were implanted rather than a single stent (18.5% vs 5.8%, P=.03); and with bare metal stents rather than drug-eluting stents (13.0% vs 7.9%, P=.24). Definite stent thrombosis was observed in 2 patients (0.9%) and probable stent thrombosis in 7 (3.1%). Female sex, impaired left ventricular function, and use of bare metal stents were significantly related with all-cause mortality.CONCLUSIONSHigh-risk patients with unprotected left main stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention presented with a high rate of major adverse cardiac events at long-term follow-up. Female sex, impaired left ventricular function, and use of bare metal stents were predictors of poor prognosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1885-5857
DOI:10.1016/j.recesp.2011.12.020