Branchial cobalt uptake in the carp, Cyprinus carpio: Effect of calcium channelblockers and calcium injection

Using tracer-uptake studies we investigated whether the branchial uptakeof cobalt occurs via selective, inhibitable, calcium uptake routes.Modulation of the calcium transport system was performed using generalcalcium channel blockers (Cd^sup 2+^, La^sup 3+^,Mg^sup 2+^), a voltage-dependent calcium c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFish physiology and biochemistry Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 1
Main Authors Comhaire, S, Blust, R, Van Ginneken, L, Verbost, Pm, Vanderborght, Olj
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Nature B.V 01.02.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Using tracer-uptake studies we investigated whether the branchial uptakeof cobalt occurs via selective, inhibitable, calcium uptake routes.Modulation of the calcium transport system was performed using generalcalcium channel blockers (Cd^sup 2+^, La^sup 3+^,Mg^sup 2+^), a voltage-dependent calcium channel blocker (diltiazem)and an intraperitoneal CaCl2 injection. Adding Cd^sup 2+^ orMg^sup 2+^ to thewater or injecting the fish with theCa^sup 2+^-solution resulted in decreased Co^sup 2+^ andCa^sup 2+^ uptake rates. Addition of La^sup 3+^ reducedCa^sup 2+^ and Co^sup 2+^ uptake rates except forCo^sup 2+^ uptake in the gills. Diltiazem displayed only aninconsistent, concentration-independent blocking of the uptake of bothCo^sup 2+^ and Ca^sup 2+^. All inhibitors which inhibitCa^sup 2+^ uptake also inhibit Co^sup 2+^ uptake. However, aclear difference in the degree of inhibition of uptake of both elements isobserved. Two possible explanations are suggested (1) Co^sup 2+^ andCa^sup 2+^ are both transported through the gills via the sametransport system or (2) the calcium transport system is not the only systeminvolved in the transport of Co^sup 2+^.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0920-1742
1573-5168
DOI:10.1023/A:1007746117932