Minimal difference between aerobic and progressive resistance exercise on metabolic profile and fitness in older adults with diabetes mellitus: a randomised trial

Question: Is progressive resistance training as effective as aerobic training of similar duration in sedentary older adults with diabetes mellitus? Design: A randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Sixty people with Type 2 diabetes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAustralian journal of physiotherapy Vol. 56; no. 3; p. 163
Main Authors Ng, Cindy L W, Goh, Su-Yen, Malhotra, Rahul, Østbye, Truls, Tai, E Shyong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hawthorn Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor) 01.09.2010
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Question: Is progressive resistance training as effective as aerobic training of similar duration in sedentary older adults with diabetes mellitus? Design: A randomised trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. Participants: Sixty people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between 8% and 10% in the past month. Intervention: One group undertook progressive resistance exercise and the other group undertook aerobic exercise. Both groups completed 18 sessions over 8 weeks. In each session, the progressive resistance exercise group did nine resistive exercises while the aerobic exercise group did 50 minutes of aerobic exercise. Outcome measures: HbA1c, blood glucose, lipid profile (total, high- and low-density cholesterol and triglycerides), weight, body mass index, body fat, waist circumference, waist:hip ratio, blood pressure, and peak oxygen consumption. Results: Forty-nine (82%) participants completed the intervention. HbA1c reduced by a similar amount in both groups (MD 0.1%, 95% CI -0.3 to 0.5). However, significant between-group differences occurred in change in waist circumference in favour of progressive resistance exercise (MD -1.8 cm, 95% CI -0.5 to -3.1), and in change in peak oxygen consumption in favour of aerobic exercise (MD 5.2 ml/kg, 95% CI 0.0 to 10.4). Conclusions: Progressive resistance exercise has similar effects to aerobic exercise and therefore offers a useful alternative for patients unable to participate in aerobic exercise. Trial registration: NCT01000519.
ISSN:1836-9553
1836-9561