Erratum

• Published in: Schizophrenia bulletin Vol. 30; no. 2; p. 218
• Main Authors: Miller, Tandy J, McGlashan, Thomas H, Rosen, Joanna L, Cadenhead, Kristin, Cannon, Tyrone, Ventura, Joseph, McFarlane, William, Perkins, Diana O, Pearlson, Godfrey D, Woods, Scott W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: National Institute of Mental Health 01.01.2004
• Subjects: Diagnosis; Disease Course; Human; Interrater Reliability; Interviews; Predictive Validity; Psychological Assessment; Psychometrics; Schizophrenia; Statistical Validity; Syndromes
• ISSN: 0586-7614; 1745-1701
• DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007072

Reports an error in the original article by Miller et al (Schizophrenia Bulletin, 2003, Vol.29[4], 703-715). In Table 1, Comparison of COPS for prodromal patients with CAARMS, under Genetic Risk and Deterioration syndrome, the second criterion in each column should have read "Patient meets criteria for schizotypal personality disorder." (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 2004-11129-007.) As the number of studies related to the early identification of and intervention in the schizophrenia prodrome continues to grow, it becomes increasingly critical to develop methods to diagnose this new clinical entity with validity. Furthermore, given the low incidence of patients and the need for multisite collaboration, diagnostic and symptom severity reliability is also crucial. This article provides further data on these psychometric parameters for the prodromal assessment instruments developed by the Prevention through Risk Identification, Management, and Education (PRIME) prodromal research team at Yale University: the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms. It also presents data suggesting that excellent interrater reliability can be established for diagnosis in a day-and-a-half-long training workshop. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)