Efeitos do treinamento de força em dias consecutivos e não consecutivos nas respostas hormonal, neuromuscular e morfológica em homens treinados recreacionalmente

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of two recovery periods between consecutive and non-consecutive days in strength training sessions on hormonal, neuromuscular and morphological variables in recreationally trained men. Nineteen young men completed the study and were rand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista brasileira de cineantropometria & desempenho humano Vol. 25; no. 1; p. 1
Main Authors Lopes, Charles Ricardo, Brigatto, Felipe Alves, de Camargo, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno, Germano, Moises Diego, Marchetti, Paulo Henrique, Aoki, Marcelo Saldanha, Politano, Hugo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Florianopolis Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Desportos 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of two recovery periods between consecutive and non-consecutive days in strength training sessions on hormonal, neuromuscular and morphological variables in recreationally trained men. Nineteen young men completed the study and were randomly divided into two groups: 24R, 24-hour recovery group (n = nine) and 72R, 72-hour recovery group (n = ten). The strength training program (RT) lasted six weeks with two serial routines, with a weekly frequency of four times. The saliva sample was collected once a week in the morning to determine salivary testosterone. The 1RM, jump against movement and body composition tests were performed in the pre- and post-training periods. As for salivary testosterone, there was no significant effect with respect to time and between groups. Both groups improved maximal strength in terms of intervention time in the barbell bench press and in the leg press 45º, not differing between groups and body composition showed significant interaction in time to body fat percentage ∆% = -14.6 ± 10.0 (24R) and -17.2 ± 10.9 (72R); p = 0.00, fat mass ∆% = -13, 7 ± 9.2 (24R) and -18.2 ± 13.0 (72R); p = 0.00 and fat-free mass ∆% = 3.5 ± 2.7 (24R) and 2.5 ± 2 .8 (72R), p = 0.00. The recovery periods 24 and 72 hours between sessions induced similar responses in the parameters investigated in recreationally strength-trained men.
ISSN:1415-8426
1980-0037
DOI:10.1590/1980-0037.2023v25e85848