783-P: Efficacy of GLP-1RA according to Type 2 Diabetes Phenotypes-A Monocentric Retrospective Study

Introduction & Objective: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is considerably heterogeneous due to different pathogenetic mechanisms that may affect response to treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of GLP-1RA according to the phenotypes described by Ahlqvist et al. (Diabetes, 2000). Methods: In this ret...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiabetes (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 73; p. 1
Main Authors Caruso, Irene, Giordano, Fiorella, Di Gioia, Ludovico, Matichecchia, Immacolata I, Cignarelli, Angelo, Sorice, Gian Pio, Perrini, Sebastio, Natalicchio, Annalisa, Laviola, Luigi, Giorgino, Francesco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York American Diabetes Association 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction & Objective: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is considerably heterogeneous due to different pathogenetic mechanisms that may affect response to treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy of GLP-1RA according to the phenotypes described by Ahlqvist et al. (Diabetes, 2000). Methods: In this retrospective monocentric study, every individual attending our outpatient clinic since 2013 was evaluated for eligibility. Main inclusion criteria were age at T2D diagnosis ≥50 years, T2D duration ≤5 years, BMI ≥25 kg/m2, first users of a GLP-1RA with at least one follow-up visit at 6-12 months. Main exclusion criteria were type 1 diabetes, LADA, ketoacidosis. The assignment to T2D phenotypes (MARD, mild age-related diabetes; MOD, mild obesity-related diabetes; SIDD, severe insulin deficient diabetes; SIRD, severe insulin resistant diabetes) was performed via the algorithm developed by Bello-Chavolla et al. (BMJ, 2020). The primary outcome was difference in HbA1c change from baseline, evaluated with ANOVA. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) allowed to rank predictors of HbA1c reduction. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to estimate differences in time to treatment failure, defined as time to HbA1c ≥7.0%. Results: We enrolled 128 patients. The SIDD phenotype was associated with a significantly greater HbA1c reduction (-1.9% vs. -0.67% [MARD], -0.75% [MOD], -0.56% [SIRD]; p<0.001) following GLP-1RA initiation after a median follow-up of 8 months. However, SHAP analysis identified baseline HbA1c, rather than SIDD phenotype, as the most relevant predictor of HbA1c change, accounting for ~0.5% HbA1c reduction. Yet, belonging to the SIDD phenotype was associated to earlier treatment failure (p<0.01). Conclusion: Easily available clinical variables such as baseline HbA1c might be more useful to predict response to GLP-1RA than T2D subclassification. However, the diverse pathogenesis of T2D phenotypes might account for differences in treatment durability.
ISSN:0012-1797
1939-327X
DOI:10.2337/db24-783-P