Scaling Behavior for Large Language Models regarding Numeral Systems: An Example using Pythia

Though Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in mathematics reasoning, they are still struggling with performing numeric operations accurately, such as addition and multiplication. Numbers can be tokenized into tokens in various ways by different LLMs and affect the numeric op...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Zhou, Zhejian, Wang, Jiayu, Lin, Dahua, Chen, Kai
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 27.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Though Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable abilities in mathematics reasoning, they are still struggling with performing numeric operations accurately, such as addition and multiplication. Numbers can be tokenized into tokens in various ways by different LLMs and affect the numeric operations performance. Currently, there are two representatives: 1) Tokenize into \(1\)-digit, and 2) Tokenize into \(1\sim 3\) digit. The difference is roughly equivalent to using different numeral systems (namely base \(10\) or base \(10^{3}\)). In light of this, we study the scaling behavior of different numeral systems in the context of transformer-based large language models. We empirically show that a base \(10\) system is consistently more data-efficient than a base \(10^{2}\) or \(10^{3}\) system across training data scale, model sizes under from-scratch training settings, while different number systems have very similar fine-tuning performances. We attribute this to higher token frequencies of a base \(10\) system. Additionally, we reveal extrapolation behavior patterns on addition and multiplication. We identify that base \(100\) and base \(1000\) systems struggle on token-level discernment and token-level operations. We also sheds light on the mechanism learnt by the models.
ISSN:2331-8422