Comment on "Comments regarding "Transonic dislocation propagation in diamond" by Katagiri, et al. (Science 382, 69-72, 2023)" by Hawreliak, et al. (arXiv:2401.04213)

In their comment (1), Hawreliak et al. claims that our observation of stacking fault formation and transonic dislocation propagation in diamond (2) is not valid as they interpret the observed features as cracks. In this response letter, we describe our rationale for interpreting the observed feature...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Katagiri, Kento, Pikuz, Tatiana, Fang, Lichao, Albertazzi, Bruno, Egashira, Shunsuke, Inubushi, Yuichi, Kamimura, Genki, Kodama, Ryosuke, Koenig, Michel, Kozioziemski, Bernard, Masaoka, Gooru, Miyanishi, Kohei, Nakamura, Hirotaka, Ota, Masato, Rigon, Gabriel, Sakawa, Youichi, Sano, Takayoshi, Schoofs, Frank, Smith, Zoe J, Sueda, Keiichi, Togashi, Tadashi, Vinci, Tommaso, Wang, Yifan, Yabashi, Makina, Yabuuchi, Toshinori, Dresselhaus-Marais, Leora E, Ozaki, Norimasa
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 09.09.2024
Subjects
Stacking faults
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In their comment (1), Hawreliak et al. claims that our observation of stacking fault formation and transonic dislocation propagation in diamond (2) is not valid as they interpret the observed features as cracks. In this response letter, we describe our rationale for interpreting the observed features as stacking faults. We also address other points raised in their comments, including the clarifications of how the results of Makarov et al. (3) are not in conflict with our study.
ISSN:2331-8422