The U.K. Restructuring Plan: Striking a Balance in Cross- Border Restructurings
Four years have passed since the introduction of the U.K. restructuring plan, often heralded as one of the most significant changes to the country's restructuring landscape in a generation. Since its inception, commentators have compared the restructuring plan to U.S. chapter 11. [...]the restr...
Saved in:
Published in | American Bankruptcy Institute journal Vol. 43; no. 9; pp. 24 - 61 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Alexandria
American Bankruptcy Institute
01.09.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Four years have passed since the introduction of the U.K. restructuring plan, often heralded as one of the most significant changes to the country's restructuring landscape in a generation. Since its inception, commentators have compared the restructuring plan to U.S. chapter 11. [...]the restructuring plan contains no absolute-priority rule in a cramdown plan, and the legislation does not provide a framework for debtor-inpossession (DIP) or priority new money financing.2 This article reflects on notable features coming out of restructuring plans to date, in particular how overseas debtors have come to use the plan and its flexibility as a restructuring solution. Governing Law and Jurisdiction Precedent shows that an overseas debtor will have a sufficient connection to England and Wales on the basis that the liabilities to be compromised under the restructuring plan are governed by English law (often supported by a choice-of-jurisdiction clause in favor of the English courts). In this case, the court found that 42 percent of the debt by value being governed by English law created a sufficient connection (when other factors were taken into account). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1931-7522 |