Divergence-free neural operators for stress field modeling in polycrystalline materials

The purpose of the current work is the development and comparison of Fourier neural operators (FNOs) for surrogate modeling of the quasi-static mechanical response of polycrystalline materials. Three types of such FNOs are considered here: a physics-guided FNO (PgFNO), a physics-informed FNO (PiFNO)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Khorrami, Mohammad S, Goyal, Pawan, Mianroodi, Jaber R, Svendsen, Bob, Benner, Peter, Raabe, Dierk
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 27.08.2024
Subjects
Coding
Constraints
Divergence
Equilibrium
Fourier transforms
Mechanical analysis
Modelling
Operators
Physics
Polycrystals
Stress distribution
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of the current work is the development and comparison of Fourier neural operators (FNOs) for surrogate modeling of the quasi-static mechanical response of polycrystalline materials. Three types of such FNOs are considered here: a physics-guided FNO (PgFNO), a physics-informed FNO (PiFNO), and a physics-encoded FNO (PeFNO). These are trained and compared with the help of stress field data from a reference model for heterogeneous elastic materials with a periodic grain microstructure. Whereas PgFNO training is based solely on these data, that of the PiFNO and PeFNO is in addition constrained by the requirement that stress fields satisfy mechanical equilibrium, i.e., be divergence-free. The difference between the PiFNO and PeFNO lies in how this constraint is taken into account; in the PiFNO, it is included in the loss function, whereas in the PeFNO, it is "encoded" in the operator architecture. In the current work, this encoding is based on a stress potential and Fourier transforms. As a result, only the training of the PiFNO is constrained by mechanical equilibrium; in contrast, mechanical equilibrium constrains both the training and output of the PeFNO. Due in particular to this, stress fields calculated by the trained PeFNO are significantly more accurate than those calculated by the trained PiFNO in the example cases considered.
ISSN:2331-8422