The bunkbed conjecture is not robust to generalisation

The bunkbed conjecture, which has featured in the folklore of probability theory since at least 1985, concerns bond percolation on the product graph \(G\Box K_2\). We have two copies \(G_0\) and \(G_1\) of \(G\), and if \(x^{(0)}\) and \(x^{(1)}\) are the copies of a vertex \(x\in V(G)\) in \(G_0\)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Author Hollom, Lawrence
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 03.06.2024
Subjects
Apexes
Graph theory
Percolation
Probability theory
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The bunkbed conjecture, which has featured in the folklore of probability theory since at least 1985, concerns bond percolation on the product graph \(G\Box K_2\). We have two copies \(G_0\) and \(G_1\) of \(G\), and if \(x^{(0)}\) and \(x^{(1)}\) are the copies of a vertex \(x\in V(G)\) in \(G_0\) and \(G_1\) respectively, then edge \(x^{(0)}x^{(1)}\) is present. The conjecture states that, for vertices \(u,v\in V(G)\), percolation from \(u^{(0)}\) to \(v^{(0)}\) is at least as likely as percolation from \(u^{(0)}\) to \(v^{(1)}\). While the conjecture is widely expected to be true, having attracted significant attention, a general proof has not been forthcoming. In this paper we consider three natural generalisations of the bunkbed conjecture; to site percolation, to hypergraphs, and to directed graphs. Our main aim is to show that all these generalisations are false, and to this end we construct a sequence of counterexamples to these statements. However, we also consider under what extra conditions these generalisations might hold, and give some classes of graph for which the bunkbed conjecture for site percolation does hold.
ISSN:2331-8422