Inference With Combining Rules From Multiple Differentially Private Synthetic Datasets

Differential privacy (DP) has been accepted as a rigorous criterion for measuring the privacy protection offered by random mechanisms used to obtain statistics or, as we will study here, synthetic datasets from confidential data. Methods to generate such datasets are increasingly numerous, using var...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Nombo, Leila, Charest, Anne-Sophie
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 08.05.2024
Subjects
Artificial neural networks
Datasets
Empirical analysis
Missing data
Privacy
Statistical inference
Synthetic data
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Differential privacy (DP) has been accepted as a rigorous criterion for measuring the privacy protection offered by random mechanisms used to obtain statistics or, as we will study here, synthetic datasets from confidential data. Methods to generate such datasets are increasingly numerous, using varied tools including Bayesian models, deep neural networks and copulas. However, little is still known about how to properly perform statistical inference with these differentially private synthetic (DIPS) datasets. The challenge is for the analyses to take into account the variability from the synthetic data generation in addition to the usual sampling variability. A similar challenge also occurs when missing data is imputed before analysis, and statisticians have developed appropriate inference procedures for this case, which we tend extended to the case of synthetic datasets for privacy. In this work, we study the applicability of these procedures, based on combining rules, to the analysis of DIPS datasets. Our empirical experiments show that the proposed combining rules may offer accurate inference in certain contexts, but not in all cases.
ISSN:2331-8422