Exploring GaN crystallographic orientation disparity and its origin on bare and partly graphene-covered \(m\)-plane sapphire substrates

The crystallographic orientation of 3D materials grown over 2D material-covered substrates is one of the critical factors in discerning the true growth mechanism among competing possibilities, including remote epitaxy, van der Waals epitaxy, and pinhole-seeded lateral epitaxy also known as thru-hole...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Lee, Hyunkyu, Hyeonoh Jo, Kim, Jae Hun, Ha, Jongwoo, Su Young An, Choi, Jaewu, Kim, Chinkyo
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 30.08.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The crystallographic orientation of 3D materials grown over 2D material-covered substrates is one of the critical factors in discerning the true growth mechanism among competing possibilities, including remote epitaxy, van der Waals epitaxy, and pinhole-seeded lateral epitaxy also known as thru-hole epitaxy. However, definitive identification demands meticulous investigation to accurately interpret experimentally observed crystallographic orientations, as misinterpretation can lead to mistaken conclusions regarding the underlying growth mechanism. In this study, we demonstrate that GaN domains exhibit orientation disparities when grown on both bare and partly graphene-covered \(m\)-plane sapphire substrates. Comprehensive measurements of crystallographic orientation unambiguously reveal that GaN domains adopt (100) and (103) orientations even when grown under identical growth conditions on bare and partly graphene-covered \(m\)-plane sapphire substrates, respectively. Particularly, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy unequivocally establishes that GaN grown over partly graphene-covered \(m\)-plane sapphire substrates started to nucleate on the exposed sapphire surface. Our research elucidates that crystallographic orientation disparities can arise even from thru-hole epitaxy, challenging the commonly accepted notion that such disparities cannot be attributed to thru-hole epitaxy when grown under identical growth conditions.
ISSN:2331-8422