Span Identification of Epistemic Stance-Taking in Academic Written English

Responding to the increasing need for automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to assess language use beyond lexis and grammar (Burstein et al., 2016), we introduce a new approach to identify rhetorical features of stance in academic English writing. Drawing on the discourse-analytic framework of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Eguchi, Masaki, Kyle, Kristopher
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 03.06.2023
Subjects
English language
Machine learning
Sentences
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Responding to the increasing need for automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems to assess language use beyond lexis and grammar (Burstein et al., 2016), we introduce a new approach to identify rhetorical features of stance in academic English writing. Drawing on the discourse-analytic framework of engagement in the Appraisal analysis (Martin & White, 2005), we manually annotated 4,688 sentences (126,411 tokens) for eight rhetorical stance categories (e.g., PROCLAIM, ATTRIBUTION) and additional discourse elements. We then report an experiment to train machine learning models to identify and categorize the spans of these stance expressions. The best-performing model (RoBERTa + LSTM) achieved macro-averaged F1 of .7208 in the span identification of stance-taking expressions, slightly outperforming the intercoder reliability estimates before adjudication (F1 = .6629).
ISSN:2331-8422