Fair Without Leveling Down: A New Intersectional Fairness Definition

In this work, we consider the problem of intersectional group fairness in the classification setting, where the objective is to learn discrimination-free models in the presence of several intersecting sensitive groups. First, we illustrate various shortcomings of existing fairness measures commonly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inarXiv.org
Main Authors Maheshwari, Gaurav, Bellet, Aurélien, Pascal, Denis, Keller, Mikaela
Format Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Ithaca Cornell University Library, arXiv.org 07.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this work, we consider the problem of intersectional group fairness in the classification setting, where the objective is to learn discrimination-free models in the presence of several intersecting sensitive groups. First, we illustrate various shortcomings of existing fairness measures commonly used to capture intersectional fairness. Then, we propose a new definition called the \(\alpha\)-Intersectional Fairness, which combines the absolute and the relative performance across sensitive groups and can be seen as a generalization of the notion of differential fairness. We highlight several desirable properties of the proposed definition and analyze its relation to other fairness measures. Finally, we benchmark multiple popular in-processing fair machine learning approaches using our new fairness definition and show that they do not achieve any improvement over a simple baseline. Our results reveal that the increase in fairness measured by previous definitions hides a "leveling down" effect, i.e., degrading the best performance over groups rather than improving the worst one.
ISSN:2331-8422